Many fungi that grow on plants, including black knot, have specific hosts. Some grow so consistently on one plant or another that
when they’re found, they can help identify a plant to its genus, if not its
species. This can be especially helpful in winter, when plant ID is challenging
Many fungi serve as reliable guides to plant identification, but here are three that are especially common or commonly sought and easy to recognize.
Black knot, Apiosporina morbosa, infects trees and shrubs in the genus Prunus, a group that includes native and introduced cherries and plums. In Minnesota, the disease is especially common on chokecherry, Prunus virginiana, a small tree found in open woods and woodland edges throughout the state. It also affects American plum (P. americana), Canada plum (P. nigra), pin cherry (P. pensylvanica), black cherry (P. serotina) and sand cherry (P. pumila). All these are native shrubs and trees, but several introduced species and cultivars of Prunus are also susceptible to the disease.
Black knot is spread in spring, when fungal spores produced in these knots are carried by wind or rain to new hosts. A year later, after the fungus has stimulated its host to grow a mass of large cells, the infection appears as a swelling with a light brown or olive-green surface. In the second summer after infection, the gall turns black. Some galls may have white or pink patches on the surface from other fungi parasitizing the knot.Tiny pores on the surface of a gall mark the exit holes for spores. They’re easiest to see with magnification. Pores are one way to distinguish black knot from chaga, a similar dark, crusty fungus that grows primarily on birch trees. Unlike black knot, chaga is sterile -- it doesn't produce spores. More on that next.
Birch Trees and Chaga
Chaga, Inonotus obliquus, is a parasitic fungus found
in northern forests around the world, including the United States and Canada.
It has been used in folk medicine for centuries and is still harvested and
consumed for its purported health benefits. Formal studies of its medicinal use
In this region, chaga grows mostly on birch trees, especially paper birch, Betula papyrifera. It also grows on yellow birch, Betula alleghaniensis, and much less frequently on alders, beech, oaks, maples and aspen.
On living birch trees, chaga looks like a hard, irregular,
black mass erupting from the trunk. Likened to burned charcoal, the surface is
a melanin-rich mass of dead fungus over an orange or brown interior. The
masses, popularly called conks, appear on trunks or large branches, but not on small
branches. An infected tree may bear 1-3 conks.
Chaga conks are the visible part of the fungus. The hidden
part lives mostly in the heartwood, where it causes white rot. The tree may
live with the infection for up to 80 years, producing slow-growing, sterile conks
that take many years to mature.
Inonotus, the fungus that produces chaga, reproduces only after its host dies. The fruiting body (actually a spore-producing body called a basidiocarp) is a mat of slender, vertical tubes formed under the bark, typically above a sterile conk. As the fruiting body develops, it exerts so much outward pressure that it will suddenly rupture the bark. It’s a fascinating find, but a rare one. Fruiting bodies are produced only once in the life cycle of the fungus, and they live for just a few days.
Chaga look-alikes include black knot and several shelf
mushrooms in the genus Phellinus. Unlike chaga, these fungi release spores through tiny pores. Black knot pores cover the gall, wheareas shelf mushrooms have a pore layer on their lower surfaces.
A note about harvesting chaga:
Because of its purported medicinal value, chaga is in high
demand, so harvest from some public lands is regulated. According to Ed
Quinn, Natural Resource Program Supervisor for the Division of Parks and Trails
at the Minnesota DNR, harvesting chaga is illegal in state parks, state recreation
areas, state monuments and state waysides. Although state park rules permit collection of
mushrooms for personal use, chaga is technically not a mushroom because it
isn’t a fruiting body -- it doesn’t produce spores. In addition,
use of spikes, ladders, knives and hatchets to reach and collect the fungus can
damage trees and create wounds that may leave them vulnerable to pathogens and insect
pests. Finally, because the fungus slowly rots the heartwood of infected trees,
climbing them can be unsafe.
The rules in state forests differ from those in state parks.
According to Dave Schuller, State Land Programs Supervisor for the Division of
Forestry at the Minnesota DNR, collecting chaga for personal use is allowed
without a permit, but host trees must not be damaged. Commercial harvest is
allowed with a special products permit from a local DNR forestry office. The
permit requires harvesters to take only the visible part of the fungus, without
cutting into the stem or damaging live trees. More information about chaga harvest
is available from the University of Minnesota Extension Service publication linked in the references
below. Again, safety is paramount when harvesting chaga. Because trees bearing the fungus may have significant interior decay, climbing them is risky and can result in serious injury.
Harvesting chaga on other public lands, such as regional or local parklands, may also be regulated. Check with the appropriate authority before heading out.
There are also concerns about the potential
effects of collection on chaga biology and ecosystem health (Thomas et al., 2020). One issue is that overharvesting
chaga has unknown effects on the ability of the fungus to reproduce. Taking too
much, too often could delay or deny Inonotus its once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity to make fruiting bodies, with consequent effects on its spread.
Overharvesting also has unknown effects on the function of ecosystems
where chaga is found. Other living things – insects, for example – may depend
on chaga in ways not yet understood. Without that understanding, aggressive
collection of chaga could have ripple effects on ecosystem health. More study is recommended.
White Oaks and Smooth PatchSmooth patch looks like it sounds: It’s a smooth patch on otherwise rough bark. Usually the area is low on the trunk and sunken and lighter than surrounding bark. Smooth patch disease is caused by any of several fungi, especially Aleurodiscus oakesii. This fungus prefers trees in the white oak group, In this region the most common hosts are white oak, Quercus alba, and bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Less often, smooth patch is also found on birch, ash, willow and basswood.
The fungi that cause smooth patch feed only on dead outer
bark and don’t directly harm the tree. Small, cup-like fruiting bodies are
often seen within the smooth patch. They are light brown or gray
with curled edges. In winter they may be
shriveled and look like lichens. The genus Aleurodiscus translates to “flour disc,” named for the whitish, dusty appearance of the
disks in spring and summer.
knot. Website accessed February 11, 2021.
University of Illinois Extension, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Black knot of plums and cherries. RPD No. 809 September 2000.
University of Minnesota Extension Service. Black knot. Website accessed February 11, 2021.
Millman, L. 2012. Chaga’s
Significant Other. Fungi 5:3, 11-12.
Min-Woong Lee, Hyeon Hur, Kwang-Choon Chang, Tae-Soo Lee, Kang-Hyeon Ka, L. Jankovsky. Introduction to Distribution and Ecology of Sterile Conks of Inonotus obliquus. Mycobiology. 2008 Dec; 36(4): 199–202. Published online 2008 Dec 31. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2008.36.4.199
Natural Resources Canada. Sterile conk trunk rot of birch. Date modified:2015-08-04. Website accessed February 11, 2021.
Spinosa, R. and Bunyard, B. No, That’s NOT Chaga! Fungi 5:3, 45-47
Thomas P.W., Elkhateeb W.A. & Daba G.M. 2020. Chaga (Inonotus obliquus): a medical marvel becomes a conservation dilemma? Sydowia 72: 123–130.
University of Minnesota Extension Service. 2013. Chaga (Clinker Polypore). Pages 99-101 in the Minnesota Harvester Handbook. Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/173824.
Smooth patch of oak
Smith, W. R. 2008. Quercus macrocarpa
Michx., Bur oak. Pages 382-383 in Trees and Shrubs of Minnesota. Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota Extension Service. Non harmful tree conditions. Website accessed February 11, 2021.
Vann, S. R. Undated. Smooth patch of oak trees. FSA7578, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture.
Volk. T. April 2006. Aleurodiscus oakesii, the oak parchment, cause of "smooth patch disease."https://botit.botany.wisc.edu/toms_fungi/apr2006.html, accessed February 16, 2021.